Accept allAccept only necessary cookies
You can either agree to all external services and associated cookies, or only to those that are absolutely necessary for the website to function correctly. Please note that if you choose the second option, not all content may be displayed.
you need the free eBook reader Adobe Digital Editions (download). After purchasing an eBook you will receive a download link. This link can only be used once and loses its validity after the download. In order to use an eBook on several devices (PC, laptop, tablet) and also after a device change without problems, please create an account with Adobe ADE. Of course, it is also possible to use the book without an account, but then you can only use the book on the device on which you have downloaded it. It is not possible to take the book to another device without an account.
Arbitration / ADR / Mediation
ICC Arbitration Rules 2021 & Mediation Rules 2014Pub. No. 892Arb | Language EN
ICC Schiedsgerichtsordnung 2021 & Mediations-Regeln 2014Pub. No. 892Arb-D | Language DE
“Jurisdictional Choices in Times of Trouble” (Dossier XII of the ICC Institute of World Business Law) The choice of jurisdiction is one of the most important provisions of a contract. The jurisdiction clause determines the national Court, and its rules of conflict, or the arbitral tribunal, whose role will be to give effect to the parties' agreement on the substance and on the applicable law. Written by arbitrators, academics and practitioners, this dossier addresses the multiple challenges facing the jurisdiction clause through an expert in-depth comparison of syndromes and proposed solutions in both arbitration and court proceedings. • Are asymmetrical jurisdiction clauses enforceable? • What is the proper law for the arbitration clause? • What occurs in countries where the validity of the arbitration agreement is determined pursuant to a substantive approach rather than one of conflict of laws? • Is there a risk that The Hague Convention on choice of court agreements will create a conflict with the current substantive law and increase ex ante uncertainty? These challenging questions and many others in relation to the effectiveness of jurisdictional choices are covered in this Dossier